I still say you need steel attachment points for the suspension.
Agreed! 'glass won't hold up to the stresses, unless it's really really thick ands solid. Mo bedder yet is a steel sub frame with all the propulsion equipment securely attached to that. That could even be incorporated into the 'glass body. "glass is a mess to work with, for me at least.
Hey fellas,
I agree
...with metal (steel or aluminum) attachment points
...& 'glass (by itself) won't hold up to the stress
So, lets "dive" (airplane &/or boat reference

) into this a bit more
* First, I'm not an expert
...so, this is what I "think"
...or "think" I know
...or at least, seems to "make sense" (to me, anyways)
So, think about a sheet of notebook paper
...if you grab it on each side & try to pull, it's very strong (in tension)
...but, if you grab it on each side & try to push together, it's not nearly as strong (in compression) & bends/buckles & folds easily
...& if (held in tension) & then, pressure is applied from the side (side load) you may be able to "poke" right thru
Next, think of a similar size piece of cardboard
...basically, the same materials as paper (wood fibers/pulp & glue, formed into a sheet)
...so, it has similar characteristics/properties
...but, because its thicker, its stiffer & stronger
...&/so, the tension strength, the compression strength & the side strength have all been increased
* Kinda follows the concept mentioned in post #70 "(2x) thicker = (7x) stiffer & (3 1/2x) stronger"
Now, let's move on to fiberglass
...which is just glass fibers & super strong glue
...& similar to paper & cardboard, it is strong in tension (but, because of the "base" materials, tremendously stronger)
...&/also, similarly it's not as strong on compression or "side loads" (but, still tremendously stronger, because of the "base" materials)
So now, for simplicity, let's say we have a monocoque made out of cardboard
...& to make it even simpler, let's say we connect the A-frame rods directly to the sides of the chassis (called "point loads")
Now, let's say the diameter of the nuts connecting the A-frame rod to the chassis was 1" (for simple math)
It should be pretty easy to "see" how the end of the A-frame rod (with only a 1" dia.) could be "punched" thru the side of the chassis
...now, let's say we insert 2" washers, under the 1" nuts & "see" how we "spread" the load out (x2)
...&/so, the bigger the "washer" the less(er) the "point load" on the panel
* Even bigger "washer" = correspondingly less(er) "point load"
& then,
If the "washer" or plate is actually fastened/bolted to the panel
...it stiffens & strengthens the area
...& "spreads" the load out, even better
&
If another "washer" or plate, is used on the inside (sandwiching the fiberglass in between)
...& then, the (2) "washers" or plates, are thru bolted together
...it stiffens & strengthens the area, even more
...& also, would "spread" the load out, even better

The same concept would apply to the (upper) shock mounting area too
...except this "mount" is more in the middle of the panel
(whereas the lower A-frame connections are near the junction with the floorboard &/so, has some "built in" structural support)

So, this mount would probably need some additional structural support
...& there are many options/ways available to do this ('which is a whole 'nuther "story" that we'll get into shortly)
