OzFab
Well-known member
Arc is not stronger than than MIG, the results that they give will be almost identical to the point of being negligible. The only difference is that MIG is harder to get a truly solid weld because turning up the heat does not guarantee better penetration, whereas with Arc more heat=more penetration directly. MIG might look good but many MIG welds are not solid because it is harder to tell a good weld from a bad one with a MIG.
Just so you know I have nothing against MIG
I don't mean to be narky or nasty but I actually take this as an insult from someone who is "self taught". I am professionally trained in mig, arc & oxy/acetylene welding & have worked extensively as a welder for most of my working life.
I didn't say that an arc weld was stronger than a mig, I said the process is stronger. Have you ever tried to weld 1mm steel with an arc welder? It can't be done because you can't turn the current down far enough; all you end up with is a bunch of holes. But, I have successfully welded 0.6mm with a mig. If that's the difference at the bottom end of the scale what do you think will happen at the top end?
I have a 130 amp mig, a friend has a 130amp arc. Wound up to max, which do you think can weld thicker material? The arc, all day, every day.
This is exactly why I started this thread. IMO, there are a lot of "self taught" welders here who think they know better than the professionally trained welders who have been welding for longer than most members have been alive (not pointing the finger directly at you, exenos; I don't know your age or history). I don't know about the other guys but I take it as an insult & a sign of disrespect when a self taught 16yo tries to tell me how to weld.
@ exenos: one thing I did notice was that the only times you did post was to tell me I was wrong