You are spot on! Extra weight, its a 2 seater, so more weight there, and I weigh 340lbs, so extra weight there too. Hence my earlier concern about running a solo 1" dia axle. Either twin axles in back, or A-arms would also help out with that, especially on hard impacts. Hence me flipping and flopping on designs for the back recently.Nice work, but adding a lot of weight ! Your arachnid probably weighs 60 pounds more than mine.
Da redflash
Haha...but two full figured guys should equal 2 rear axles right? Especially with the mini-smoker/multi-port rocket stove bolted on up front. Gonna need a little extra strength after eating slugging back pork sliders!I’m a big boy also! Just keep the bearings close to the wheels and the axle will be fine! Us full figured guys got to help each other out.
Good point. Im going to end up buying an extra set of shocks to stiffen it up in the back too.You got to remember also while you may have 2 axles back there your still only going to have only 1 pivot point. So, theoretically you still have only 1 axle.
Those are both great ideas, ill check jar lids, and if that doesnt work, the sandwich idea is great. Im putting a hole in the center anyways.What about just using an old jar lid? Some pop rivets and silicone sealer. If you keep going with the aluminum you’re going to have to anneal it a couple of times to get it soft and keep it soft enough to shrink the sides. Remember it’s not about forcing the metal. It’s more about getting it to do what you want it to do.
You could also cut out 2 circles of mdf in the diameter you need. Sandwich your sheet metal between the 2 and bolt then together in the center. Then slowly work the sheet metal around the form. Removing the sheet metal along the way and annealing it a few times along the way.
Good advice, and makes sense. We shall see once I have it in hand. I saw a variance of answers for the belt dia on this one. Both from the seller, and other Polaris forums. One said that it does run 1-3/16". Figured its worth the shot at the price! If it doesnt make sense after measuring, ill pony up and by the Comet 90D. The larger dia made me a little more comfirtable to offset a deeper sitting belt (due to being 1-16" too narrow). But my CVTech does say it can run a 1-1/4" wide belt, but it will need a small shim to work right. Apparently Comet made the EZGO Polaris driven too.Don’t be afraid of the stamped steel secondary clutches a lot of sleds used them for a lot of years. The problem with using a narrow belt in a cvt that was designed for a wider belt is the faster upshifts. Meaning it will go into a higher ratio faster than you may want.
Think my eyebrows must have just popped loose from how high up they jumped when I saw that nearly an inch thick steel tube. Obviously the 1-1/4" must be the I.D., since there wouldn't be any I.D. if that was the O.D. like usual.Also picked up 27' of 1-1/4" square tube 0.83 thick wall.

Haha, shes gonns be a ship anchor! I forgot a zero.... 0.083" thick wall.Think my eyebrows must have just popped loose from how high up they jumped when I saw that nearly an inch thick steel tube. Obviously the 1-1/4" must be the I.D., since there wouldn't be any I.D. if that was the O.D. like usual.![]()
![]()