OneTimeUser
We Don't Rent Pigs
I've begun design work on a telescoping intake manifold that will start out long and get shorter as RPMs increase.
Wish me luck...
Wish me luck...
I have jokes but Ill wait to see the finished project.I've begun design work on a telescoping intake manifold that will start out long and get shorter as RPMs increase.
Wish me luck...
The joke was my plan itself.I have jokes but Ill wait to see the finished project.
Good luck!
OK, didn't know that. I guess I'll stop working on my patent application.Multi length intakes are already a thing. They use butterfly valves to switch from a long runner at low rpm to a shorter one at higher rpm.
Yes , finicky and prone to carbon fouling from egr systems.
Oh, I think we all have jokes. But this is a family friendly site.I have jokes but Ill wait to see the finished project.
Good luck!
Im curious as to the gains on that. Make a new thread and post your findings..... But an idea I am thinking about is to change the intake rocker to a 1.3 rocker while keeping the exhaust at 1:1.
Made my day.Here you go. It’s even ribbed for her pleas... I mean the accordion provides turbulence so's to atomize the A/F mixture better, or whatever the concept is.
View attachment 164604
To really know, I would need a dyno. The butt dyno is not going to notice the possibly tiny change, if any. At least, my butt dyno is not that calibrated. So the only other measurement will be acceleration and top speed. And that may not be enough to point at a measurable result. But I'm still curious.Im curious as to the gains on that. Make a new thread and post your findings.
Your not changing duration, just opening the valve a little more. The overlap wouldn't change so theres no scavaging benefits.
Maybe a slower intake velocity. Miniscule.