B.M.800
TheBeal.
Not mine...
B.M.800, did you see post 15 or 17? LOL. The main problem with that design is that you would get something like 3/4 of a revolution on each kick, that could make getting an engine started a royal pain.
B.M.800, did you see post 15 or 17? LOL. The main problem with that design is that you would get something like 3/4 of a revolution on each kick, that could make getting an engine started a royal pain.
B.M.800, did you see post 15 or 17? LOL. The main problem with that design is that you would get something like 3/4 of a revolution on each kick, that could make getting an engine started a royal pain.
That kid's thinking!!! I'll bet his next move is to rotate the housing around so he doesn't eat the next pull-rope...
Now theres where your wrong. 3/4 revolution. how do you think a kick starter works?
you kick it down and it spins the engine over how ever many times according to how hard you kicked it.
Thats actually a great design in that picture.
Hopefully in all of this, he'll tie his shoes...
...I would think that the number of times the engine is spun by the kick-start is directly related to how much you move the kick-start lever, not how much force you apply to it.
...
I'm sorry, I made a typo... 3/8 of a revolution is what I was thinking. I'm confused with your second statement, have you used some kind of variable ratio kick-start? I would think that the number of times the engine is spun by the kick-start is directly related to how much you move the kick-start lever, not how much force you apply to it.
Go over to oldminibikes.com and read the thread the person who made that kick start had. It is mentioned that starting the briggs was difficult because the engine didn't make enough revolutions.
toystory_4wd- You think the thread is 1/2"-20, what model of briggs is this for? Like hp/displacement?
Just to be sure, are these start clutches typical for these series of flat head engines, 3hp to 10hp for ex.?
I was meaning to go visit the lawnmower shop to get one of these to look at.