I was taught that lying leads to long noses, pants on fire, and wolf attacks. None of these were true. Who is lying now, teach?Bobby, what did we teach you about lying? Now go to your room and think about it for a while. But say your sorry first to the nice man.
Boring? You know nothing of Bobs, Jon Snow.The only thing I learned was Bobs are incredibly boring!!!
Assuming an ACTUAL 440cc displacement, 34mm is a bit small according to the math which means it's going to pull a little richer than it should... it clearly is. Since the A/F bleed on a VM is behind the fuel inlet it regulates additional fuel to the pilot (or low speed) circuit, and by having it in 1 turn farther than default you are artificially leaning out the low side because inward is leaner, out is richer.Hey guys, I got a 440 Duromax engine. Billet flywheel, Billet side cover, Billet connecting rod. 275 Dyno cam, 55 lb valve springs. NR Racing Honda 390 Head with 40 mm intake, 38 mm exhaust stainless valves, head shave .060, (this NR Racing head has the small intake port for low end power. The port was matched to my intake manifold) 1.2 ratio roller rocker arms, chrome moly cut to length push rods. + or - 34 BTC ignition timing. Mikuni 34 MM round slide carb with a 15 low jet 210 main jet. Float set at 22 mm. Auto lite plug. Engine fires right up. Runs strong. You hit the throttle and no faultering, it just takes off. But after a bit of running it mis-fires once in a while at cruise RPM. The plug gets black right away. So I say it's running too rich.
Any tuning advice? Should I go even smaller on jetting? It is a gravity fed fuel tank. The bleed screw or whatever it's called is 1 turn out from being seated. I can't read the number on the emulsion tube but it starts with a 159. The needle in the slide is set in the center slot.
I done told you the problem. You won't be able to lean it out to the ideal range without using obscenely small jet sized and it going to be a moody POS when you do get itStill running way too rich.
Well, it runs pretty good. Idles okay, but rich. I have the AF at about 2 turns. Throttle response is good. If you just let it idle for a minute or so and mash down the go petal it hesitates. But if you rev it a couple times then put it in gear and hit the throttle away it goes. I may try a bit smaller idle jet. But here's a question. The float on these should be in the 22-24MM range. Mine is at 22. 22 is the top of the range and 24 is the lower setting. If I shut off the fuel supply after about 10 seconds the idle really smooths out. Could this mean I need to lower the float to the 24 mm range? There is zero over flow.I done told you the problem. You won't be able to lean it out to the ideal range without using obscenely small jet sized and it going to be a moody POS when you do get it
No, float level isn't going to make it run that different. Timing could be an issue but again in the grand scheme the carb is too smallWell, it runs pretty good. Idles okay, but rich. I have the AF at about 2 turns. Throttle response is good. If you just let it idle for a minute or so and mash down the go petal it hesitates. But if you rev it a couple times then put it in gear and hit the throttle away it goes. I may try a bit smaller idle jet. But here's a question. The float on these should be in the 22-24MM range. Mine is at 22. 22 is the top of the range and 24 is the lower setting. If I shut off the fuel supply after about 10 seconds the idle really smooths out. Could this mean I need to lower the float to the 24 mm range? There is zero over flow.
On a related subject. Ignition timing. I think I have it at the 32-34 degree range. A 6 degree offset key was used. I am thinking of getting a degree wheel so I can nail down a more precise timing range. Any advice on this.
So you suggest what? A 36mm? I understand the single cylinder vacuum stuff going on with these engines. I have higher than stock compression with a 40mm intake valve with a small intake port for low end power. I did machine the port at the intake manifold to match up.No, float level isn't going to make it run that different. Timing could be an issue but again in the grand scheme the carb is too small
Exactly, maybe a 38mm actuallySo you suggest what? A 36mm?
So if I understand you I’m not getting enough air? I got too much fuel. So a 38 mm with smallish jets.Exactly, maybe a 38mm actually
√(440)×2 = 41.95 (round to 42)
The problem with that equation is it is over simplified for quick use, is assumes 100% volumetric flow efficiency which even the best built race engine can't accomplish. Because of this fact the rule of thumb is go a carb size or two smaller than the sum rounds off to, going 3 sizes under is the smallest you can get away with and still get relatively "normal" tuning responses.
I would absolutely not recommend going larger than 40mm, and I am fairly confident that a 38mm is going to give you the best results and least tuning drama
A 38mm will allow more air, thus allowing a "normal" jetting range.So if I understand you I’m not getting enough air? I got too much fuel. So a 38 mm with smallish jets.
Makes sense. It runs pretty good now. Lots leaner. I’ll try and drive it around a bit and check the plug.A 38mm will allow more air, thus allowing a "normal" jetting range.
The problem isn't specifically too much or too little air, but rather too much negative intake pressure.
Too small of a carb will draw too much fuel because the the pressue will pull from every hole it can find, not just atmosphere...and a too big carb won't pull enough fuel due to the lack of sufficient negative intake pressure to pull much of anything from anywhere.
Think of it in terms of a garden hose... the water pours out (big carb) but no real pressure. Then you stick your thumb over it and have a lot of pressure (small carb). Though it's a different type of pressure in the hose the principal remains the same, the right size carb get the right pressure and runs as it should.