Keegan
New member
Thanks for your input guys! I have thought of those downfalls to this design. You both are 100% correct that this is a poor design for something that has to handle well. I certainly wouldn't want this in a autocross vehicle!
As I see it, with the rear axle being wide (40 inches plus those wide tires) and fixed with no suspension and the frame being so stiff I don't see this thing having really any body roll. Also, as I've stated before this is a low speed ride for little kids (ok Dad may have to drive it too)
I've never built a suspension system before so this is kind of a "see if I can do it" type of build. If it totally sucks (better than 50% chance I hate it) then I can add the second shock and make it a traditional setup.
By all means keep calling out flaws and mistakes because I'm sure there are plenty. I just felt I should explain why I'm continuing down this path without looking like a moron.
As I see it, with the rear axle being wide (40 inches plus those wide tires) and fixed with no suspension and the frame being so stiff I don't see this thing having really any body roll. Also, as I've stated before this is a low speed ride for little kids (ok Dad may have to drive it too)
I've never built a suspension system before so this is kind of a "see if I can do it" type of build. If it totally sucks (better than 50% chance I hate it) then I can add the second shock and make it a traditional setup.
By all means keep calling out flaws and mistakes because I'm sure there are plenty. I just felt I should explain why I'm continuing down this path without looking like a moron.