I really need to get a list of things you've said aren't possible and prove you wrong about so many things. This might be one of them.
Blue, it can work but you'd get crap performance. You've probably noticed that on all engines the inlet valve is a bit bigger than the exhaust valve. This is because the atmosphere pushes (engines don't technically suck in air, the atmosphere pushes air into the cylinder) air into the cylinder at 14.7 PSI, the gasses are pushed out of the cylinder at serveral times that. Thus you have a larger inlet valve so it can flow enough air at the lower pressures it is subjected to.
By making the air flow through the tiny valve and less than optimal port (not that the inlet would be much better, Briggs have horrible port design) you're going to drastically decrease your volumetric efficiency (from the all ready crap standard) and thus your power. Couple that with undoubtedly unidyllic cam timing and you'l have an engine that'd be lucky to run, if it did it'd be gutless.
However, if you were to get a cam made (or make one your self) and sort out the valves ect it'd work quite well. You'd need to relocate the spark plug (and a few other things) to get it to work just as well as standard.
Basically, it's not worth the effort.
Just make a new inlet "manifold". Simply 2 flanges and a bit of pipe welded together. Much easier than getting the engine to breath through the "wrong" ports.
Thanks
Hayden