porsche930dude, i see we think alike! that is EXACTLY how i had wanted to do it originally... BUT... Always a catch, am i right?!
Ok, i dont mean to get all mathematical and $#@% on ya, but here goes- its the only way i can explain my problem with this setup.
The shock i will be using is about 110LBS/IN.
The sprung weight of the bike with me on it will be around 325LBS.
the weight distrib is about 45/55, so lets say 175lbs on rear wheel.
the wheel is mounted on the swing arm at 18.75 from pivot, and the mount on the swing arm is at 5.75 from pivot.
175*18.75=3281.25
3281.25/5.75=570.65
570.65 Round to 570 for easyness
570 is how much pressure is pushing up from the swing arm at that mounting point (5.75).
Somehow, i need to get that shock 110LBS/IN to hold up a weight of 570LBS and still be able to have more room to travel for bumps etc.
For this reason, the bellcrank that you drew in yellow, cannot have a 1:1 ratio. it needs to be more like 4:1 so that the shock will act like a 110LBS/IN * 4 or a 440LBS/IN shock.
This way, the shock will only compress about 1.3" when all of this weight is on it...
However, this is only the basics, this doesnt incorporate the fact that none of these forces are acting at right angles, and due to that, all these numbers change drastically, not to mention, the angles all change depending on how compressed the suspension is.
The major problem is that i cant have a bellcrank with a 4:1 ratio because there isnt room for it to pivot, and the movement of the swing arm is difficult to move in unison with the small side of the bellcrank.
Uhh so if i didnt completely mind boggle you...


lemme know what ya think about all this.
