New to building & my first build

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
I am in the process of building a kart using a sled engine, a Yamaha 440ss to be exact, I have the orginal primary, seconday, carb, and exhaust, I have the whole sled to be accurate. From my understanding a lot of people have used sled engines in their builds, my thought was to run a 20t drive coming off of the secondaries drive shaft and a 37t driven on the live axel, my plans are to use 1x1x0.125 cold rolled square tubular steel. using a basic box design, I have no plans, but yet I do have a plan to build on the go. if anyone has any pointers or guidance anything and everything would be appreciated, also would a chop saw be recommended for making the angles or should I be using a steel band saw? also im thinking of doing a stiff frame(suspensionless)
 
Last edited:

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
after further looking around and research I found a design I liked and will be pursuing, i'll be going with an arachnid build lol, I know is common lol but looks like a sweet ride and im hoping can handle the engine, any input as far as that engine size with that cart is welcome
 

Poboy kartman

Senior Moments Member
Messages
12,461
Reaction score
63
Location
White Settlement Texas
Jeeze!!!! Another Canadian......:ack2:....

Well......welcome to the forum. .....I guess......:rolleyes::lolgoku:

It's just a little joke we have around here....you'll see

So.....Welcome to the forum! !!!!!
 

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
yeah another Canadian I guess lol, but a go kart lover none the less lol, but what if I just moved to the states lol? and it said I was from the states lol difference I think not lol consider it more as a neighbor lol
 

OzFab

Well-known member
Messages
15,615
Reaction score
66
Location
Warwick Qld, Australia
Don't panic about the Canadian thing, it's an inside joke around here, you'll catch on soon enough :thumbsup:

my thought was to run a 20t drive coming off of the secondaries drive shaft and a 37t driven on the live axel

That sounds very steep to me, that's less than 2:1; we usually recomment somewhere in the neighbourhood of 6:1

my plans are to use 1x1x0.125 cold rolled square tubular steel.

It's better to use large, thin wall tube than small, thick wall tube; using 1" thick wall tube, you'll end up with an very rigid & heave pig of a frame; 1.5"x0.085" is as strong or stronger, with a little more flex (with a rigid frame, you want a bit of flex...)

using a basic box design, I have no plans, but yet I do have a plan to build on the go. if anyone has any pointers or guidance anything and everything would be appreciated

-Build around the engine
-don't be afraid to expand a little
-please include some type of roll bar or cage...

also would a chop saw be recommended for making the angles or should I be using a steel band saw?

You will end up with stronger, more accurate joins if you simply notch the tube, ie: cut out a wedge & leave one side intact; whether you use a bandsaw, grinder, hacksaw or a blunt knife is up to you but, it's extremely difficult to achieve this with a drop saw...

Remember that, when cutting angles, you need to measure half the angle from the square line; for instance, if you want a 60° angle, mark a line square across the tube, then mark 30° on each side of the square line...
 

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
That sounds very steep to me, that's less than 2:1; we usually recomment somewhere in the neighbourhood of 6:1

I did some reading on that but I was curious to that seeing as how im using a sled primary and seconday prior to the sprocket ratio, or please do correct me should I use a 6:1 and allow the sled drive to get closer to that 2:1 ratio?


It's better to use large, thin wall tube than small, thick wall tube; using 1" thick wall tube, you'll end up with an very rigid & heave pig of a frame; 1.5"x0.085" is as strong or stronger, with a little more flex (with a rigid frame, you want a bit of flex...)

I will be using 1"x1"x0.065 square tubular steel, I did get plans for the arachnid and it said to use 1-1/4 and 1"

-please include some type of roll bar or cage...

I will most definitely be doing that and more then likely a harness lol and skid plates etc... once it's all said and built
 

mckutzy

Well-known member
Messages
8,353
Reaction score
107
Location
bc, canada
Dude, a fellow Canuckistani here. Don't let the Texan bunch rub ya. They're all good bunch of guys, I say this as there is a good amount of them here.

Poboy just has a way of testing the newbie peeps, see how thick a skin and how good a retort they have back.
He's all good.
 

OzFab

Well-known member
Messages
15,615
Reaction score
66
Location
Warwick Qld, Australia
I did some reading on that but I was curious to that seeing as how im using a sled primary and seconday prior to the sprocket ratio, or please do correct me should I use a 6:1 and allow the sled drive to get closer to that 2:1 ratio?

I'm not saying you should use 6:1 but, 1.85:1 is never gonna work...

Compare the size of the sled drive wheel to the size of the wheels you intend to use; if the wheels are (let's say) 3 times the size of the sled drive wheel, the axle sprocket needs to be 3 times the size of the sleds driven sprocket to compensate...

I will be using 1"x1"x0.065 square tubular steel, I did get plans for the arachnid and it said to use 1-1/4 and 1"

That's fine when using a low powered industrial, gy6 or pitbike engine but, a 440cc sled engine isn't exactly "low powered"; to compensate for the extra power, you need extra steel but, whatever, it's your funeral...

I will most definitely be doing that and more then likely a harness lol and skid plates etc... once it's all said and built

Rule of thumb is if there is roll protection in use there should be a restraint; if it's a flat kart, there should be no restraints... :thumbsup:
 

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
That's fine when using a low powered industrial, gy6 or pitbike engine but, a 440cc sled engine isn't exactly "low powered"; to compensate for the extra power, you need extra steel but, whatever, it's your funeral...
Lol exactly why im asking. First build so the more info I can get the better, what about using a rectangular tube what would be your thoughts on that? or even bumping up their 1" tube to 1-1/4 and the 1-1/14 to 1-1/2?
What would be thought of having a casing around the chain(chain case) and having a lubricant inside said case?(ATF fluid,gear oil, etc)
 

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
got a new quote and I went with 1.5 and 1.25, will be adding additional support with what I have for extra.
Also after research I decided to do as recommended and go with a 6:1 ratio, may change to a 5:1 later on if I feel the need to, with also be going with #41 sprockets and 420 chain
 

OzFab

Well-known member
Messages
15,615
Reaction score
66
Location
Warwick Qld, Australia
That's a bit of an "either/or" situation, both have pro's & cons so, it would be a matter of making the list to see if it's viable...

I'm loath to say yes or no on this because, IMO, it's not a bad idea but, it's not necessarily a good one either...

Does that help? :lolgoku:
 

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
lol yeah, kinda like a yellow light, either you punch it and make it before its red and risk getting a ticket lol or wait for the next green and it's to late lol I have read up a lot of other people doing the arachnid build and having issues with the hinges if you would lol? I am thinking about scrapping those and using the angle steel to create those parts and will be able to properly align using a drill press?
 

Yamaha440SSKart

New member
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Location
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
I understand that lol, but here's my thought though, it is an older sled, meaning it was like 80% steel lol, like I know the skid out of it is heavier then **** lol, not to mention the track weight, and the engine frame lol, im thinking I may be close to the same weight. If the Yamaha engineers for that sled thought that it'd be a good ratio then im thinking it should be good here to? of course gearing a lil bit lower so maybe to a 2.5?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top