My New Toy

bob58o

SuckSqueezeBangBlow
Messages
9,646
Reaction score
1,830
Location
Chicago-town USA
Yes it was, it was just an added cost option.
Chevy didn’t make a 327 in ‘55. The 327 didn’t come out until ‘62. And it wasn’t offered in the Bel Air with a 4 barrel carb until ‘64. However in ‘64, the correct ignition timing would be 4 degrees before TDC.
 

Denny

Canned Monster
Messages
11,575
Reaction score
7,999
Location
Mayberry, Indiana
Bob, I know all that. I’ve been around GM and Chrysler cars a long time. That’s all SBC 101. ;) What is the only difference between Chrysler’s 426 Street Hemi and the Race Hemi! Take a deep dive down that rabbit hole. And what was Chrysler’s cost to build each one?
 

bob58o

SuckSqueezeBangBlow
Messages
9,646
Reaction score
1,830
Location
Chicago-town USA
Bob, I know all that. I’ve been around GM and Chrysler cars a long time. That’s all SBC 101. ;) What is the only difference between Chrysler’s 426 Street Hemi and the Race Hemi! Take a deep dive down that rabbit hole. And what was Chrysler’s cost to build each one?
I was just quoting more testimony from Marisa Tomei. lol.

Miss Mona Lisa Vito told me the race Hemi had a CR bump to 12.5 :1 from 10.25 :1. But I also read sumthin about Aluminum heads and a magnesium intake.

Camshaft? Solid lifters? Stiffer valve springs? Headers?
 

Denny

Canned Monster
Messages
11,575
Reaction score
7,999
Location
Mayberry, Indiana
I was just quoting more testimony from Marisa Tomei. lol.

Miss Mona Lisa Vito told me the race Hemi had a CR bump to 12.5 :1 from 10.25 :1. But I also read sumthin about Aluminum heads and a magnesium intake.

Camshaft? Solid lifters? Stiffer valve springs? Headers?
The only difference between the Street Hemi and Race Hemi is the Race Hemi had solid cam and lifters and the Street Hemi had a hydraulic cam and lifters. Each 426 Chrysler built, Street or Race cost them over $8,000 at the time!
 

bob58o

SuckSqueezeBangBlow
Messages
9,646
Reaction score
1,830
Location
Chicago-town USA
The only difference between the Street Hemi and Race Hemi is the Race Hemi had solid cam and lifters and the Street Hemi had a hydraulic cam and lifters. Each 426 Chrysler built, Street or Race cost them over $8,000 at the time!
So the internet lied to me about the heads? Iron vs Aluminum? 12.5 CR vs 10.25?
 

Denny

Canned Monster
Messages
11,575
Reaction score
7,999
Location
Mayberry, Indiana
Yes they did. Chrysler never produced an aluminum head for the 426. Donovan, Ed Pink and a bunch of other aftermarket suppliers did though.
 

Denny

Canned Monster
Messages
11,575
Reaction score
7,999
Location
Mayberry, Indiana
Yes they did. Chrysler never produced an aluminum head for the 426. Donovan, Ed Pink and a bunch of other aftermarket suppliers did though.
 

Denny

Canned Monster
Messages
11,575
Reaction score
7,999
Location
Mayberry, Indiana
Yes they did. Chrysler never produced an aluminum head for the 426. Donovan, Ed Pink and a bunch of other aftermarket suppliers did though. Are you sure your not confused with the modern hemi?
 

bob58o

SuckSqueezeBangBlow
Messages
9,646
Reaction score
1,830
Location
Chicago-town USA
Yes they did. Chrysler never produced an aluminum head for the 426. Donovan, Ed Pink and a bunch of other aftermarket suppliers did though. Are you sure you’re not confused with the modern hemi?
I’ll take your word over AI. Damn lying AI stroked out and said the 1965 Race Hemi (A990) had Aluminum Heads. The 64 Race Hemi (A864) had iron. A990 was available in the 65 Dodge Coronet or 65 Plymouth Belvedere

Perhaps we are looking specifically at the ‘64 A864 version? It seems the info came from here…


“The Hemi engine reintroduced in 1964 was the called the "Race Hemi." This engine was developed from the 426, but featured a Hemi-head. The result was the 426 Hemi. The 426 had iron heads, a 12.5:1 compression ratio, and single Holley 4-bbl carburetor mounted on a cross ram manifold. Engines intended for the drag-strip had an aluminum cross ram with dual Holleys. In 1965 the A-990 race Hemi was introduced with aluminum heads and magnesium intake manifolds.”

IMG_8528.jpegIMG_8527.jpeg
 
Last edited:

bob58o

SuckSqueezeBangBlow
Messages
9,646
Reaction score
1,830
Location
Chicago-town USA
My pops passed when I was 7 in 1990, but if I remember correctly he had a 5.0 Cadillac that looked sumthin like this… but maybe it wasn’t 5.0. By 1990, we were rocking a Suburban.

IMG_8529.jpeg
IMG_8530.jpeg
 

panchothedog

Well-known member
Messages
2,788
Reaction score
3,735
WTR. Those are both beautiful ( and valuable ) car as I'm sure you are aware.
Are they both yours? Lots of 4 speed performance cars in 60's were sold with very low geared rear ends. Some lower yet. Like 4:56 & 4:88. But then again we weren't cruising along at 75 to 85 mph with one hand on the steering wheel.
65 was considered moving right along, and 80 mph was a bonsai run. You didn't keep it there for any length of time. Once again, love your two cars.
 

panchothedog

Well-known member
Messages
2,788
Reaction score
3,735
WTR. Those are both beautiful ( and valuable ) car as I'm sure you are aware.
Are they both yours? Lots of 4 speed performance cars in 60's were sold with very low geared rear ends. Some lower yet. Like 4:56 & 4:88. But then again we weren't cruising along at 75 to 85 mph with one hand on the steering wheel.
65 was considered moving right along, and 80 mph was a bonsai run. You didn't keep it there for any length of time. Once again, love your two cars.
 

panchothedog

Well-known member
Messages
2,788
Reaction score
3,735
WTR. Those are both beautiful ( and valuable ) car as I'm sure you are aware.
Are they both yours? Lots of 4 speed performance cars in 60's were sold with very low geared rear ends. Some lower yet. Like 4:56 & 4:88. But then again we weren't cruising along at 75 to 85 mph with one hand on the steering wheel.
65 was considered moving right along, and 80 mph was a bonsai run. You didn't keep it there for any length of time. Once again, love your two cars.
 

panchothedog

Well-known member
Messages
2,788
Reaction score
3,735
WTR. Those are both beautiful ( and valuable ) car as I'm sure you are aware.
Are they both yours? Lots of 4 speed performance cars in 60's were sold with very low geared rear ends. Some lower yet. Like 4:56 & 4:88. But then again we weren't cruising along at 75 to 85 mph with one hand on the steering wheel.
65 was considered moving right along, and 80 mph was a bonsai run. You didn't keep it there for any length of time. Once again, love your two cars.
 

panchothedog

Well-known member
Messages
2,788
Reaction score
3,735
Damn site kept telling me " OOPS we have a problem, try again later " every time I tried to post. Had no idea that they had posted 4 times. Haven't quite lost my mind yet.
 
Top