Another check in folks. I ended up replacing the snapped solid aluminum axle with a 46" 0.25 wall chromoly unit (the aluminum was 45")... it is nicer, but on our first test ride out I already bent it. I tried to climb a steep trail I had no business climbing (30*, at least), and at the worst possible time, I pressed on the brakes, and "pfffssssh", the nylon line sprung a leak right at the fitting where it was stressed the most. I lost all brake pressure while stalled out half way up the hill. I had to do quick thinking as I rolled backwards and turn into into the bank, which did flip me. It seems I hit the bank hard enough to bend this new axle... oh so slightly. Fortunately I made my boy wait at the top while I attempted this... he might have made it as he's 150 lbs lighter than me, and might not have had the leg strength to bust the line, but I'm so glad he wasn't in the kart.
No matter how you slice it, it might have been a stupid move. I'm lucky I have no broken bones. If I were thinking quicker, I'd have just hit the gas to slow down rolling backwards, but apparently I'm not a quick enough thinker. It might have also been enough to wheel me over backwards, who knows.
More hard lessons learned:
1. I hate the air brake nylon lines. They might be okay for light track karts, but they are BS for anything else if you ask me. I bent steel lines everywhere, and used the nylon only where it needed to be flexible. I'll be installing braided brake lines everywhere it needs flexibility and eliminating nylon lines.
2. The reason this stalled is because the torque converter sheeve does not retract to gear down under load so it bogs severally as you slow down... even on gentle hills this is a problem. Maybe this is just a limitation of this kind of clutch, but I really hope a higher quality unit will operate better. I'll probably start a new thread on TCs, and ask questions about upgrade options from the cheap chinese 40 series. I want to go to a 44, but they are unobtainium right now for a 1" engine output.
3. Another critical design flaw in the grand daddy design is the width of the rear subframe. I may try to widen this one, or build a new one from scratch to be the same width as the rear corners of the main kart frame. There is 9" of distance from the bearings to the hub, which might be fine with lighter loads, but with the weight of the bigger motor, additional steel for frame mods, and the fact that adults will want to hop in this (don't kid yourself, it'll happen), I think you want to get those as close to the wheel hubs as possible. Outriggers could be built for the bearings too, but the extra width and room in the subframe will be nice for mounting the transmission, jackshaft, brakes, alternator, etc...
4. The roll cage did save me. Were it not for some cross bracing I added it would have bent for certain and the whole thing would be garbage now, but the frame does not appear to have tweaked at all, so, I may actually add more cross bracing or at least some gussets.
5. I had plans for handbrake that would operate a mechanical caliper for a backup/parking brake. The lever is installed but I didn't get around to adding the caliper. This would also have helped, and will be a high priority now.
6. Go karts like this are not meant for riding up logging skid roads in the mountains. Maybe if I had the 670 (hmmmm....)
One day... ONE day, I do plan to start a thread and/or videos to outline all the changes I think the GD plans should incorporate, so others don't have to rebuild their kart multiple times like I am.